Since the launch of the iPhone 7 lot is h talked about the glass that protects the lens of the camera of the device, as well as the button Crystal home under which is the fingerprint sensor. Some stress tests carried out by different people and uploads to YouTube have stopped questioning official specifications of Apple to “demonstrate” that do not reach the level of resistance that should have a material such as Sapphire, and many have come to ensure that Apple did not use this material, lying to its customers, or I used a sapphire of poor quality and therefore not resisted as it should. But a new video shows it is Sapphire, to analyze the composition of the glass in the laboratory, and even Apple has issued an official statement. All the information below.
Click here to view the embedded video.
The video that there is this on top of these words is the same person who questioned the composition of the glass of the camera in another video above, and is a gem because it cannot be more rigorous and objective in itself, coming to analyze under the electron microscope the glass of the iPhone’s camera and comparing it with a Tissot watch Sapphire Crystal. Despite being in English, it is worth because there are few occasions in which a YouTuber was taken so many annoyances in creating a video as rigorous. In it we can find also the solution to all this mess on the Sapphire and why scratch when it shouldn’t. The explanation is simple: no scratching, fracture. Although it may sound the same, really it is not. The glass of the camera is not thick enough to withstand the pressure during the test, and although at first glance it seems that you scratching with a hardness 6 punch (should not be if it is Sapphire), the reality is that the pressure makes you crack the glass, not that scratching, as you can see under a microscope.
Apple by its part not has doubted in confirm that effectively the glass is of Sapphire, as already did the same Phill Schiller makes ones days in Twitter, insisting in that that type of tests must make is in a laboratory meeting a series of requirements very precise to have validity. Compare the Crystal of a watch with a glass of a mobile camera is not correct, since the thickness of both crystals is very different and therefore the level of pressure that supported up to break is not the same. It seems that the mystery has been solved.
